Nicholas Carr’s essay "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" brings attention to the potential cognitive effects of using search engines such as Google. Nicholas Carr argues that the widespread use of search engines like Google is negatively impacting our ability to concentrate, think deeply, and retain information. This essay aims to provide an academic summary by organizing Carr’s arguments and evidence into clear paragraphs with evidence to support original claims on the subject. Through this analysis, we will assess how these digital tools may be reshaping our cognitive processes and explore the supporting details that Carr presents to substantiate his claims.
	Carr highlights that heavy reliance on search engines like Google can impair our concentration and hinder in-depth thinking. He puts forward that with instant access to vast amounts of information scattered around the internet, our brains become accustomed to jumping from one topic to another without fully engaging with the material and the thousands of distractions that a user can encounter on the internet, such as various videos, pictures, and blogs, thus, dismissing much concentration. Carr’s argument here implies a connection between our attention spans and the ease of information retrieval through search engines. What he is trying to say here is that many people rarely try to dig into information further than what it actually is, 
2
since the information is already readily available on search engines such as Google. To support this perspective, we can draw upon studies that examine patterns in digital reading and their correlation to diminished focus over time.
	Personal experiences shared by Carr serve as unreliable evidence illustrating how our cognitive abilities are affected by constant web browsing. He describes a noticeable decline in his own reading comprehension as he resorts to snippets of texts found online rather than engaging with longer-form content such as books or lengthy articles. Instances like these make Carr’s argument relatable and contribute to reinforcing his stance on the transformative influence search engines can have on our intellectual processes. His own experiences and evidence of others online suggests that he has prior knowledge on the subject as well and has experience to back up his claims, which makes it a viable source of information. Neurological research also exists which demonstrates alterations within brain functioning resulting from prolonged exposure specifically tied towards user dependability upon platforms like Google for gathering information. Some research gathered from the University of London has shown that when people started going to the internet for information they might be interested in looking into, they developed a habit into “power browsing” or “skimming” long articles without really digging into it before jumping to another webpage with new information, this is an example of a shortened attention span since users are prone to clicking various hyperlinks that may distract them from the actual subject that they are reading. This effectively explains that the attention span of people when they are viewing these sites are dramatically decreased since there is always more information on the internet ready to be viewed within an instant. 

3
	While strongly voicing his concerns, Carr acknowledges possible counterarguments himself or those suggested by reputable sources demanding appropriate attention before dismissing them entirely. Responding sensibly employing justifiable reasoning supported solid facts helps fortify our understanding of logical analysis critically developed while reading Carr’s 
essay so far. Consequently, enhanced portrayal regarding true potential negative impacts exerted-out through continuous usage aforementioned digital resources can be realized elaborating deeper along required lines ensuring comprehensive summary build-up.
	In conclusion, Carr's essay, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" delves into the cognitive effects that can arise from relying heavily on search engines such as Google and other webpages on the “Net”. He argues that the overuse of the Internet and utilizing these search engines can lessen our cognitive ability skills as we become accustomed to shallow reading, basically, reading without actually understanding what the topic actually means, alongside with a shortened attention span. Our minds are also prone to neurological changes as we the users keep continuing to use it. This summary focuses on separate findings regarding diversion of attention, unreliable depictions indicating decline in reading prowess and substantive neurological studies confronting biological modifications may be caused from tech-related usage patterns, such as being on the internet for a significant amount of time, which can lead to these neurological differences or changes, as Nicholas Carr’s mentioned in his report. Moving forward, what I am trying to aim at is that Carr is trying to clarify any viewpoints that might disagree with this article's reasoning by using clear and supporting evidence, while he also utilizes logical reasoning behind every statement. With this, it can improve comprehension, making the content more organized to the reader and easily understood from both sides of the party.