Welcome back friends, welcome back. I'm James Corbett of CorbettReport.com
coming to you as always from the sunny climbs of western Japan here in May of
2023 with Questions for Corbett. But not just any old edition of Questions for
Corbett. This is Questions for Corbett number 100!
Alright, okay, so because today is a festive occasion, I thought I would do
something special, as people may or may not know. Not only is this the 100th
edition of Questions for Corbett. This is actually the year of the 10th
anniversary of Questions for Corbett. Yes, it was back in 2013 that I decided to
start the Questions for Corbett podcast, where I get a lot of questions in via
email every day. I might as well answer some of them. So I decided to start a
podcast series dedicated to doing so. And as you will know, if you've been
watching Questions for Corbett over that time frame, the idea has evolved
over time. Originally, I was trying to answer a couple of dozen questions every
single episode, and eventually I switched to just one question per episode, so I
could do a proper deep dive and give each question its proper due. But I thought
for Questions for Corbett number 100, I'd do something special. Let's revert back
to form, try to answer a lot of questions. And since it's the 100th episode, I
might as well try to answer 100 questions. Why not? With a big disclaimer and
master risk, of course, this is not going to be as deep dived and detailed as my
singular focus. Questions for Corbett episodes. But hey, I get lots and lots of
emails more than I could possibly answer, even if I did nothing else other than
answer people's questions all day every day. So I'm going to clear the decks. I'm
going to take 100 questions out of the mailbag and then sweep the decks clean
and we'll start again with episode 101 in the near future. But until that point,
let's answer 100 questions that have accrued and accumulated in the old mailbag
and, well, without further ado, let's get straight into it. Question number one
comes from Justin, who writes, how are you? Fine. Question number two, I was
wondering, could you shed any light on the situation in Armenia? What situation?
No, I guess not. Questions from Toofail come in. Number three, what's your
opinion on the YouTube channel redacted? I don't know. I don't watch it. You
lost me at YouTube. Question four, do you think Russia, America, the UK and
Europe are all working together behind closed doors to implement this new
world order, order the Great Reset? Yeah. Question number five, question for
Mana. Hi, you're a hero to me and my family. I like to think that I'm great at
investigating and I haven't found anything in previous videos as of yet,
but with the incoming financial theft about to take place, I'm trying to
invest properly as I have more than the insured 250K here in the US. So I'm
learning about Treasury bonds and see that Japan is the largest foreign
holder of Treasury securities. Is that a good thing? And should I be shifting
into these securities? I don't know if this message will reach you, but you
mentioned you live in Japan, so if you have time to share your thoughts, I
sure listen to them. Okay, thanks for the questions, Anna. You can use the
search bar on CorbettReport.com to search for treasuries and see what I
have said on this subject in the past, but long story short. US treasuries have
been as good as gold since the birth of Pax America in the post-World
War II era because the dollar, of course, has been the world reserve currency, at
least since the point of Bretton Woods at the tail end of World War II. And
first, of course, as we know, it was pegged to gold, but then it was delisted
from gold and essentially became pegged to the petrodollar, the petrodollar
system. So as long as you have trust in the full faith and credit of Uncle Sam
and his continued world hegemony at the point, barrel of a gun, then yes, by
all means, invest in treasuries. But if you do trust in Uncle Sam and his
continued world hegemony, I have some bad news for you. The current
world order, as you might not know, is coming to an end and it is
being replaced by globalism 2.0, aka the multipolar world order. The death of the
dollar is being deliberately engineered and the Petro Yuan is on the rise, along
with the Digital Yuan, aka the global slave currency. And yes, the economy is
currently undergoing a controlled demolition, which is prompting us to
party like it's 1907. So you might want to think about investing in
treasuries and whether that's betting the farm on such an investment is a good
idea at this point. And oh yeah, oh by the way, I guess there's the whole, when
you invest in treasuries you are helping to finance the world's most pervasive
despotic, destructive evil empire in human history. But you know, I mean, if
ethical considerations have anything to do with your investment. Anyway, every
single thing that I just mentioned there will be linked in the show notes for
questions for Corbett number 100 at CorbettReport.com slash QFC 100. So you
can find plenty more links to plenty more reading on those subjects. Question
number six comes from Haytham. Hey, smiley face. Regarding the interview of the
Dancing Israelis, do you have the original? Thank you for the question, Haytham.
I'm assuming you're referring to the interview on Israeli TV that I played
in 9-11 subjects, Dancing Israelis, in which Oded Elner declares quote, the
fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily.
Our purpose was to document the event. Of course, I did link up the source I had
for that video in the transcript of 9-11 Suspects, Dancing Israelis, but I do
not have an original recording of the broadcast on Israeli TV as it was
originally broadcast. All I have is that footage with that translation hard
coded over top of it, dubbed over top of it. So I do not have the original
broadcast footage. I don't know if that exists online. So if anyone out there
has it, please let us know. I'm sure Haytham and myself and many others would
be interested in it. Question number seven comes from Paul. Heard about the
$2,500 PayPal fine controversy and their walk back since then. What impact would
this have on the ability, for example, of the Canadian Freedom Rally to raise
support if something like it occurred in the future? Is this a way of possibly
stifling viewpoints and shaping the narrative? Easy question. The answer is
yes. And if you need more elaboration on that, please see episode 413 of the
Corbett Report on Give Sand Gone. Question eight comes from filled with
malice, who writes, James, please give those of us that utilize the Brave
browser to give our rewards to you. Media monarchy has his site verified to
receive them. This would give users yet another way to give to your cause
internationally without banking needs. Thanks for the offer, but sorry, chief.
No can do. It, quote, it looks like you're in an unsupported country for a
brave creators with uphold, so your channels won't appear as verified.
However, once your country is supported, you'll automatically become verified and
be eligible to receive payouts to your uphold account. So a, not only is it
not possible right now, but b, that also sounds like a bunch of gobbledygook for
KYC type cockamamie nonsense that is not crypto in any meaningful sense of the
word, and I would not be using in the first place anyway. But thanks for the
offer, I guess. Question nine comes from Jack. I saw an interview recently with
Mr. Gage, Richard Gage, I assume, and they asked him how they were able to keep
everyone involved in 9-11, I assume. Quiet. What's your take on this?
Compartmentalization. Question 10 comes from Cancer Man. Hey, I just have watched
really simple syndication solutions watch, and I just wanted to thank you for
spreading RSS propaganda among your viewers. If it's not a problem, could you
make a screenshot of the feeds you're subscribed to or share if it's possible
in Feedly. The video is in 360p, so it's hard to figure out what are these. Sure,
here you go. By the way, I hope the cancer is okay. Okay, question number 12, sorry,
11. I'm already losing count. Comes from Myalleys. Myalleys. Climate change means a
change of climate, which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity
that alters the composition of the global atmosphere, and which is in addition
to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods. End quote.
Doesn't the statement, that statement, which is in addition to natural climate
variability observed over comparable time periods, mean that natural climate
variability is being taken into consideration in the definition of
climate change, which makes the following statement from Dr. Tim Ball,
limited it deliberately to only human causes of climate change, and the basis
of your argument incorrect, considering the exact definition does take into
consideration natural variability before any possible anthropogenic causes.
All right, for those who have no idea what this is or the context of it, this is
in response to my QFC on the IPCC that I did recently, and is the IPCC rigged?
Spoiler, it is. But anyway, this has to do with the definition of climate change
that Dr. Tim Ball was pointing to that was baked into the cake from the
foundation of the IPCC, and I understand, I think I understand why you read the
sentence the way you're reading it, but you are reading it incorrectly, so let me
do my best to illustrate this with a very crude drawing. So if you're listening
to this, you might want to make a note of the time and watch the video later on,
or whatever the case may be. But okay, we've got a graph, and we have this
climate variability, and of course, as we know, it's this big hockey stick, right?
The temperature suddenly shoots up in the modern era, and that's not at all a
product of fudgery, right? Oh wait, there's actually a brand new paper from, or not
paper, but report from Steve McIntyre breaking down yet more of the hockey
stick nonsense. If people are interested, I'll link it up in the show notes. But
okay, let's just go with this. So there's the, this is the global average
temperature, and suddenly it starts spiking up, right? So this is, let's just
say this is the, this is the baseline, and so this is, this is climate change, right?
So all of that is climate variability. But some, as even the IPCC is admitting, as
you note in that definition, some of this is natural, and some of it is human. So
let's say, let's say this bit is natural, and everything above this line is human.
So this bit is natural, right? So this is natural, we'll call it N, and this bit is
the naughty man-made CO2 bit, so we'll call that M, right? So we've got the M
bit and the N bit. So they're saying that this area all together is the man-made
plus the natural, right? That's, that's all of the climate change. But they're
saying climate change, they are saying climate change means a change of climate
which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity, and which is in
addition to the natural variability. So they are saying climate change is this M.
That's what this is, and N in addition to N. So, no, it's exactly as Dr. Tim Ball
was saying, exactly as I portrayed it in that episode. They are saying climate
change is the man-made contribution. That is what that sentence means. Please
read that sentence again if you're having any difficulties with it. I hope this
extremely crude drawing gets the point across more or less. But thank you for
the question. Let's move on to question 12. Question from Jimmy. Do you send out
notifications directly via your own newsletter system for subscribers? I had
previously used a service called follow.it, but now I see that you have a
sub-stack email sign up instead on your homepage for notifications. If you don't
use your own direct mailing service, should we switch to sub-stack's system
from follow.it? One issue I have with follow.it is that it always seems to
notify a day or two later and it's just a brief header along with having ads. Yes,
you're right. Follow.it was useless. I've stopped using it. It is still sending
out emails to whoever is subscribed to that list. But yes, they've got ads
plastered on it. It's a day late and a dollar short and it's just it's a
ridiculous horrible service. I'm not using it anymore. If you are subscribed to
the follow.it email list, I think you shouldn't be. Please do subscribe to the
corporate report. Sub-stack, corporate report.substack.com. Question 13 comes
from Adora. The law that Reagan signed releasing all liability for pharmaceutical
companies for vaccines in 1986. Period. Why don't we repeal that law and put
liability back on the makers of vaccines? Question mark. Things would change for
the better real quick. Agreed. Question 14 from Leaf. The idea of globalism has
always seemed to me to be impractical, having far too many working parts
that rely on far too many lines of faulty and brittle communication. And
therein lies the rub. What if what if its failure is built in? What if while we
rage against the globalist machine, we miss the true purpose of the endeavor?
To fail. The loss of independent manufacturing and agriculture has made
everyone vulnerable to the deliberate destruction of our new interdependence.
So interdependence as a weapon of war. Its removal as a deliberate ruse to leave
leave the world broken. One power-based dominant as a savior ready for
imperialist control. Okay. Well, yes. Okay. I see what you're saying. I'm not
exactly sure of your critique of the concept of globalism because I'll point
out that the one power-based of imperialist control that we're being
prepped for is one form of the globalism that we're opposing. The other form
being the multipolar UN-led kind. But I have written about the deliberately
deliberately created chaos which will be used to justify the order, the New World
Order, many times. For example, I wrote an editorial on chaos out of order. May
shed some more light on that issue. Question 15, question from Tylene. I'm a
bit of an economic and conspiracy rube, but is it suspicious that the first
bank to fail in the recent bank run crisis was Silicon Valley Bank, whose
depositors were mostly tech startups, etc. Since their deposits are covered by
the NDIC, but given this group's limited reserve reserves, future
depositors will not be. Okay, you're not wrong. I think SVB's fall is
suspicious. And if you're interested in learning more of the details of that or
why I think that, I recommend you check out my podcast on Operation Checkpoint
2.0 and on my recent work on Party Like It's 1907 for more on that. Question 16
comes from Tyler. Hey, James, have you ever come across big stories that are
true, as they are told? True. Capital T, capital R, capital U, capital E, as they
are told. Or does everything ultimately have some layer of lies or deception?
Define true. Sorry, define capital T, capital R, capital U, capital E. Question
19. Question from Robster. Do you have a transcript of episode 436 opting out of
CBDCs? I'd love to translate it to Dutch. I'd love to have it in Dutch. If I have a
transcript of something that I've done, I post it on the website. So if there is no
transcript, that means I haven't got one. There are many services that provide
machine transcripts of audio, audio to text. But all the ones that seem like they
might be useful, obviously seem to cost money. If anyone knows a good free open
source version of audio to text, that doesn't just create a sort of machine
massive, unformatted garbage that has to be heavily edited in order to post. Let me know.
Let us all know. Because again, it could be very handy for translators in the crowd or others.
Question 20. Question from Jeff. Why not promote the use of Wi-Fi jammers
in all locations where voting machines are used? Okay, indeed. Why not?
21. Question from Robin. I have people pitching me on Novatek and they use your name a lot
as the talk distributor in the company. Is this true? No, it is not. Fake news. I have never
heard of Novatek. I have no idea what it is and I'm not even gonna look it up. But here's a hint
for you. I don't do advertising or sales pitches and I don't put my name on products or what have
you. So anyone who is putting my name on their product is lying to you and should be treated
as a liar and stayed away from, in my opinion. Question 22. Question for Tim. Do nuclear bombs
even exist? Yes. Questions for Daniel. Question 23. We saw the FBI-driven plot to kidnap Governor
Whitmer of Michigan for which those individuals were convicted and now a supposed home invasion
of Speaker Pelosi's home that seemingly resulted in serious injury. Aside from boosting their
election prospects since they don't seem to be doing so well, is this another attack,
is this attack another intelligence-directed co-intel pro-terror attack directed out of
a politician? It's possible, yeah. 24. Could we now see a potential series of plotted attacks
against politicians, including against the president and or their families for the purposes
of furthering the domestic terrorist agenda, amongst other agendas, especially if these
attacks result in serious injury to or death of a politician's loved ones? Yes, we could.
Question 25. Question from Glenn. From time to time I poked my head down the rabbit hole to see
what's going on but have made a conscious effort to avoid getting totally sucked in again. I lost
my job for not accepting our Lord and Saviour Pfizer and busted my 50-year-old ass going back
tree planting last year as they didn't require bending over for Big Pharma. Fortunately, job
hunting is easier this year just as it appears the world economy is ready to tank. Fortunately,
my partner shares the same disdain for the Canadian government and the buzz of their mindless drones.
However, I believe he's been fully sucked into a black hole of counterintelligence. Every day,
he tells me something new and completely out to lunch, like the bad guys have been arrested
and or executed in Guantanamo and drones are standing in for them. That Donald Trump has
the baddies by the balls and he's just biding his time before the big reveal. That we are all
getting $10 million on April 1st. Well, coming on now. Thanks to the quantum system or some other
nonsense, my partner lives on bit-shoot and his daily debriefings are basically non-stop.
On one hand, I'm glad he's not regurgitating the talking heads of CBC and CNN. But on the
other, I'm wondering if he's proof that I'm in a simulation and my mind-trip chip has cracked.
My thinking is that a lot of what's on bit-shoot, or at least what my partner is watching,
is a CIA sci-op or the like to undermine all conspiracy theories. Say enough stupid stuff
enough times, stupid people will start to repeat it. It's the mantra of mainstream media,
but it seems to be working in the opposite direction too. Of course, it plays nicely into
the hands of the governments that are actively trying to censor disinformation. We need to
silence the Corbett report because conspiracy theorists believe the earth is flat. There's no
connection, but stupid drones don't know that and don't care. Corbett bad Hulk smash. Just wondering
if you have talked about this in any of your previous podcasts or have information I could share
to enlighten my partner that he's being had. Okay, thank you for the email, Glenn. Your concerns
here, I think, are not misplaced. I did make my a brief history of Hopium podcast as a direct
response to the QAnon craziness and other examples of that type of off-the-deep-end thinking that
people get into when they sense some new Hopium supply out there. So you can find that at Corbett
report.com slash Hopium. I recently had a conversation on the truth over comfort podcast
about that very podcast. But long story short, of course, the establishment is going to
use the broad brush of conspiracy theorists to smear the Corbett report along with whatever birds
aren't real nonsense is trending in the fake alternative media in the current times. And
the weak-minded people in the crowd, of course, are going to jeer at the screen in their two
minutes of hate that they're told, okay, you know, this, this is the new thing we all believe and
yay, okay, whatever. But then anyone who falls for that kind of self-evident nonsense was never
really part of my audience, my intended audience in the first place. So perhaps no big loss.
Anyway, if people can see that they're being had, awesome. And if they can't, I don't know how to
help them. You can leave the horse to water, but you can't make it. Think. Question 27 comes from
Octium. Is there such a thing as a good billionaire? Of course there is. Of course there is. Oh,
God, I'm a musk, the good billionaire who's owning the limbs and with all of his sick means, I tell you.
What to do about mass unemployment? This is going to be a massive social challenge.
And I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income.
I mean, it's more complicated than this, but it's, in a lot of ways, it's kind of like a
fit bit inner skull with tiny wires. So we need to go from having an untaxed negative
externality, which is effectively a hidden carbon subsidy of enormous size,
$5.3 trillion a year according to the IMF every year. We need to move away from this
and have a carbon tax.
Oh, yeah. Sorry. Never mind. What was I thinking? Yeah, good billionaires? I say no, but not
definitionally so. I don't think it's part of the actual fundamental nature of billionaires that
they inherently must be evil. But in the system as it exists, in this structure, in this fake and
phony rigged economy that we are in that is rigged from the bottom up, from the creation of the money
supply itself on up. Yeah, you have to play ball with the globalists in order to become
a billionaire in this society. You have to attend Bilderberg and or World Economic Forum and or
Tri-Lateral Commission and or CFR. You have to play ball with the Fortune 500. You have to do
all of these things. Elon Musk, technocratic huckster, no exception for people who may have
missed my podcast on the subject at corporatereport.com slash musk. So I say no, there are no good
billionaires. But hey, maybe I'm wrong. If you think there's a good billionaire out there, please
tell us. Enlighten us who you think that is. And we'd all be interested to hear it, I'm sure.
Question 28 comes from Rodrigo, who writes, what happened to the investigation that were
that the investigations that were going on in WTC7 about the missing trillions and the current
situation about the 21 trillions? All right, thank you for the question, Rodrigo. I think there may
be some confusion here because I've talked, for example, about the Pentagon Army budget analysts
who were working in the Pentagon, specifically that part of the Pentagon that was destroyed on
9-11, several members of that team having died as a result of 9-11, and their relation to that
part of the 21 trillion story, which is a much bigger story, but that was one part of it. I
have talked about that before. As to WTC7 investigations into the missing trillions,
I'm not sure, off the top of my head, I'm not sure what that might be referring to. I know there
was the CIA office that was in WTC7. There was Enron Records, SEC records that were being stored
there that were conveniently destroyed that day, other such things besides, but I'm not sure
specifically about 20 missing trillions investigations in WTC7. As for the 21 question mark
trillion missing trillions and where that is, well, I've had a lot to say on that subject
over the years. So if you go to CorbettReport.com and you're typing missing trillions into the search
bar, you will find a compendium of some of these reports that I've done over the years,
the latest of which was my conversation with Catherine Austin Fitz back in November of 2019,
but I've talked to Dr. Mark Skidmore about this. I've had video reports, presentations, QFC episodes,
all sorts of things have mentioned the missing trillions and I've detailed and quantified that
over the years to the point where, of course, yeah, 21 trillion was kind of the last number that was
compiled, at least that I saw, but as Catherine Austin Fitz points out with FASAB 56, if I'm
remembering off the top of my head correctly, then basically we don't know. It could be,
I mean, it could be anything from zero to 100 quadrillion and we have no insight into that
number whatsoever because it is now a big black box. Anyway, if you want more on that,
just type missing trillions into the CorbettReport search bar and all will be revealed.
Question 29 comes from M. Nate. Hey, Corbett, did you hear about chaos by Tom O'Neill?
A superficial glance of the book makes it look like it goes into how Charles Manson was an MK
Ultra asset. I was wondering if this book is a limited hangout and if this was information
the conspiracy community knew for a while. It'd be interesting to hear your thoughts on this.
Well, sorry to disappoint, but I have heard about that book. I haven't read it and I haven't done a
lot of research into Manson in particular, that case, so I can't comment on it in any great detail
I don't have anything of value to add. If anyone else in the audience has something to add, love to
hear it. Question 30 comes from Yuto. Hi, James. I'm currently attending college at the University
of California Davis and plan on studying Japanese in my time here and also plan on living in Japan
in the future as well. There isn't a career path I've chosen to dedicate myself towards at the
moment and so I would really appreciate it if you can share some advice on some career paths or
steps I can take in ensuring that the one I can I take can allow me to have at least some level
of autonomy and freedom. Thank you. All right. Thank you for the question, Yuto. And I'm not
trying to trivialize or downplay the question. It is an important question, but you should be
asking people in your life this question. You should not be asking some stranger on the internet
this question because my sum total of my entire knowledge about your entire existence comes from
this one paragraph. I know nothing about you or your situation or your context or your skills or
your talents or your abilities or your interests or anything about you. So please do not listen
to advice from people who know nothing whatsoever about you. Having said that, I mean, I could talk
about my own career path and how I ended up doing this for a living, but I don't know if that is
relevant to you in particular or really anyone else on the planet. But anyway, I mean, if people
are interested in that, I guess I could go into that. I did talk about that in a sense, finding
your lifestyle of liberty in a recent Solutions Watch. So that might be helpful. But if you want,
okay, if you want career advice from someone you don't know who knows nothing whatsoever about
you, then I will say you should be a structural steel detailer. The world needs more structural
steel detailers. There you go. Problem solved. Again, not to trivialize the question. It's an
important question, but I don't think I'm stranger on the internet as the person to be answering it
for you. Question 31 comes from Brian. Something that puzzles me as someone who attempts to eliminate
others to the fraudulent and spurious origin of all things COVID is that the C-SPAN broadcast
in October 2019, which was put on by the Milken Institute, does not receive more attention in
our camp. This panel discussion that includes Fauci and other industry and government insiders
discussing the need for a universal flu vaccine seems to me to be one of the very best smoking
guns in existence for several reasons. One, it takes place in October 2019. Two, it's obviously not
a fabricated video. It includes real people talking about their desire for a universal
vaccine hitting the market. Three, it includes a comment by Rick Bright saying that maybe what
could happen is that an entity of excitement that takes place in China could kick off the need for
an mRNA vaccine. What am I missing? Wouldn't a logical person see this video? Seeing this video
immediately understand the hoax. All right, thank you for the question, Brian. And I do,
I appreciate your point. That is exactly why I have pointed to and talked about this
Milken Institute talk over and over and over. I have talked about it several times and I agree.
I think it is, again, if not a smoking gun admission, at least it is an extremely important
point, data point on the trail that leads us towards the 2020-2021-2022-2023
scammedemic shenanigans. So yeah, I agree. There's really important things in there. I have attempted
to draw attention to it numerous times. I guess people weren't listening when I did that.
But as to the latter part of your question, and wouldn't a reasonable person see this
and immediately understand the hoax? Well, presumably, but how many people are reasonable
persons? I mean, I appreciate the innocence that such a question seems to exude, but
as someone who's been ringing alarm bells about things that seem quite obvious and quite
immediately transparent for 16 years now, I can tell you, just because you have something that
any reasonable person should be able to immediately understand the hoax doesn't necessarily mean it's
going to be that way. It doesn't mean we stop trying, but I just don't think many people are
going to see it the same way you do. But please do try. Question 32 comes from Greg. 87% of
journalism majors regret their choice. Only 87? James, what did you major in? Feels like it
could be helpful for the younger generation to hear how someone who succeeded at journalism
started out. Thank you for the question. The answer is English. Question 33, question from Camille.
I noticed that you avoid or barely scratch the surface of some other topics that are very present
in the alt-medias, like the occult rituals and beliefs of the power that shouldn't be
ancient gods, aliens theories, World War II gas chambers, synchromisticism, etc. I was wondering
if it was because you don't want to confuse your audience with topics that sound crazy,
fear censorship, some topics are forbidden to talk about in some countries, feel uncomfortable,
scared by some topics that deal with dark occultism, magic, sacrifices, etc.
feel illegitimate or knowing enough about it, etc. Relatedly, question 34 from Hugo.
I hope some more some more persons have learned about Daniel Sheehan. You've not featured him.
I'm a little curious as to why. He's worked for the Jesuits, but he has played a lead hand in
many an important case in the USA. I ask, why have you not looked into the Karen Silkwood case
in the USA supply of plutonium to Israel? Relatedly, question 35 from Anna. Forgive
my bluntness, but why are none of the alternative, for lack of a better word, media channels mentioning
the information contained in the 1991 report, Conspirators Hierarchy, the story of the committee
of 300 by Dr. John Coleman. Relatedly, question 36 from Joe. Is there a reason you never mentioned
the Olympic Games and the COVID situation in Japan? Is there a reason? Relatedly, question 37
from Leonard. Are you familiar with Dr. Judy Wood? And if so, why have you not interviewed her or
examined her findings? Relatedly, question 38 from Robster. It's a pity that James never talks about
this. The problem is that we have given the power to create money out of nothing to a handful of
international bankers. Check out the Web of Debt, a fascinating book on this subject.
Question 39, relatedly from Bob. You are uncharacteristically silent on the plight of
Mr. Assange. Care to comment? Relatedly, question 40 from David. I tried searching
Adrena Chrome on your website and nothing came up. Have you ever commented on the topic?
Are there certain topics you intentionally stay away from? For various reasons, such as lack of
supporting evidence? Thanks for the questions, guys, and many, many, many, many related questions
that I could throw in here. I could have a 100-question edition of Questions for Core,
but just comprised of those types of questions. Why haven't you talked about blah blah blah?
The bizarre part about this is if you look into this, each and every single one of these topics
that I have, I don't talk about, I've never said anything I stay away from, I have talked about
in the past. I certainly have talked about spirituality. I've talked about occultism.
I have talked about synchromisticism. I have featured Daniel Sheehin. I have covered the
USA's plutonium supply to Israel. I have talked about Coleman's conspirators hierarchy. I have
talked about Judy Wood. I have done multiple questions for Corbett and other podcasts about
COVID situation in Japan and how it relates to the Olympic mess. I have made an entire
documentary about the Federal Reserve and the control of the money supply and the creation of
money that featured Ellen Brown, the author of Web of Debt, who I have interviewed many times.
I have talked about Assange on multiple occasions. I have talked about Adrenochrome.
All of these questions is in an odd, every single one. Why have you never said blah blah blah?
Well, actually I have. Does that change the question? Probably not, because it's probably
going to then immediately turn into, well, why haven't you mentioned this enough?
So you can never win that game, but that's because I think fundamentally often these
questions do not come from a genuine, they're not a genuine question, really. Why haven't you
talked about this? It's generally appointed, why haven't you talked about this, you shill?
It's generally two steps removed from that accusation. The underlying idea of this is that
if I'm not talking about this thing in the way that you want and delivered in the style and
presentation that you want at the times that you want with enough repetition so that it becomes a
core part of my message or something, then I'm a shill who's holding back. Even if I have demonstrably
talked about the things that you've accused me of not talking about and calling me a shill for it.
So to the extent that any of these questions or any of the many many many others like them that
I receive on a regular basis are sincere, then here's the bottom line. I do talk about many,
many, many subjects, including all of the ones listed. I talk about whatever I want to talk about
whenever I want to talk about it in whatever way I feel like talking about it. And that is my
prerogative. I am a free, independent human being. I will talk about whatever I want to talk about.
No one tells me what to talk about or what not to talk about. And no one threatens me or implies
some kind of like, oh, I think you're a shill unless you talk about this. No, I'm going to continue
to do my research and talk about things that I feel like talking about at any time that I feel
like talking about them. And no one will tell me otherwise. And you wouldn't want it any other way,
really. You wouldn't want me to be beholden to anyone or any outside pressure to talk about this
or not talk about this or to address this in this way or you didn't talk about this enough or blah,
blah, blah, blah. No, I'm just going to put my information out there as best I can. This is what
I'm researching. This is what I'm talking about. This is what I'm thinking about. And I'm not going
to try to represent some other viewpoint that isn't mine. Why would I? Why would you expect me to?
So, having said that, if you are interested in these subjects, absolutely go spread the
word about them. Go talk about them until you're blue in the face. But why would you expect me
or anyone else to talk about your thing for you? That doesn't seem like the way forward to me.
Anyway, so I will never answer to anyone about why I do or don't talk about their particular
pet hobby horse. You have your own voice, use it. Question 41 comes from Giselle, who writes,
How would reports such as yours be affected by Bill C-11 in Canada if it's allowed to pass?
Do you expect less new viewership from Canadians who are not already aware of your good work?
It's certainly a possibility. Just depends how it is implemented. And yes,
is implemented is the correct way of phrasing it. Because I hope Canadians in the crowd are at
least aware of Bill C-11. But in case you aren't, well, I'll throw in the link so you can find out
more about it. But oh, by the way, oh, yeah, it did actually just pass. So we'll see how it gets
implemented and we'll see what kind of effect that has on the Canadian media landscape. Questions
42 through 45 come from Gavin, 42. I resided UK and listened to BBC Radio most days,
mostly six music, but occasionally there's speech radio. Recently, I enjoyed an eight-part
documentary on Radio 4 called The Coming Storm on the events surrounding January 6th. Do you have
any thoughts on this phenomenon? Not really. Was there a question 43? Was there a similar
mass formation involved as with the scandemic? No. Question 44, have you any thoughts on the
likes of musicians such as Eric Clapton and Van Morrison, who were very public in questioning
the COVID narrative? No. And question 45, have you heard Dangerous by Morrison? I think so.
Question 46 comes from Loft. Off topic, is there a reason for the tracking apps on the front page?
Okay, good question, Loft. For people who are interested, let's go to the front page. So here
we are on corporatereport.com and I will assume that you have some sort of privacy badger or some
equivalent that will let you know about the tracking apps that are located on any page. And
oh my god, there's Google calls all over this page. There's Odyssey and API Odyssey and
back-end Odyssey, of course. But what's this all this Google garbage? Well, as you may or may not
know, I spent many, many hours of hair-pulling torture extracting and getting rid of every
single Google call out of all the widgets and everything else that's connected to the corporate
report so that it was a completely Google call free page. But as you correctly point out, Loft,
look what has snuck back in to the front page. Now, what could it be? Is it Odyssey? Is it the
Odyssey player? Well, actually, as it turns out, no, it is not Odyssey. It is this. It is the
Substack widget, which is calling Google fonts, because how could you possibly have fonts unless
they're from Google, right? And calling Google for all that Google crap to put a widget so that
you can type your email in and click subscribe. So thank you for pointing that out. That, again,
I have spent more time than is humanly reasonable on this considering I am my own tech support. So
as we are conversing here live on air, I am going to swap out that widget so that now
when I refresh the page, it is going to look like this. And if you scroll back down to the
receive email updates, it is going to say, click here to sign up for email updates,
and you will click through. And that will take you to my Substack. And so now there's no widget,
there's no handy dandy big thing to, hey, sign up for email updates. And here's the box to put
in your email, make it easy for people. Nope, because apparently you can't do that without
Google. So now it is literally just a link and you just click click here, and it will take you to
my Substack. And now if we check privacy badger, yep, it's just the Odyssey calls now. Google's
gone once again. So thank you for bringing that to my attention. And yes, if Google does sneak
back on the front page, please do let me know, because I tend to not check every day for what's
new on the calls for everything that's on my website. Anyway, thank you for that. And I just
want people to know why suddenly the receive email updates here is just this link, this text link
that no one will see. And I'm sure there are a lot fewer people will sign up for the email updates
now. Well, anyway, say lovey, at least we got rid of Google. So thank you for that loft. Question
47 comes from boros Boris. What are your thoughts on the Theranos saga? Good question. And here's
the answer. You're welcome. Question 48 question from candlelight question at a minute and change
into the podcast. And this is on a solutions watch on giving thanks. You say, let's talk about the
practice of giving thanks. And we're putting this in this the addition of solutions watch.
We're making this an addition of solutions watch because yes, I think my question is,
who is the we in your statement? Just curious. Well, thank you for the question. The answer is
that I say we when talking about what we are exploring or what we are thinking about today,
because I am not talking to an audience. I'm not talking at you. I am talking with an audience.
You are part of this conversation in the exact same way that we are currently engaged in an
exploration. We are in an addition of questions for Corbett. And we are answering questions from
the mall bag right now. The mall bag. The mall bag. Come on, guys. The mall bag. Really?
You have one job and you get that wrong. Ridiculous. All right. Moving right along.
Question 49 comes from Richard V Z V Z. By the way, did you know the search bar doesn't show up
on the mobile friendly Corbett page? Really? Let's check that. Okay. Mobile. Mobile.
There's the home button. And if you click on that, you get the drop down. That's
the the top bar on the regular desktop site. I scroll down a little bit.
Search. Enter search terms. Yep. It's there.
All right. Question 50 comes from caveat episode after stellar episode. You come out with brilliant
connections and throw in little casual comments like I didn't did an episode on that back in 2012
with number chapter and verse. And this seems to happen in spontaneous responses, as well as
prepared ones. But how homes how could you talk a bit about your ways of storing and classifying
data mentally, remembering it all and grabbing what you need from the vast storehouse of your mind?
The vast storehouse of my mind. That's a nice phrase. Well, thank you for the question. It's
kind of an impossible question to answer because I don't I don't know how my mind works or how I
do that. There's no trick to it. Doesn't your brain work this way? I could say that generally,
when I'm citing specific episode numbers and what have you from the archives, usually more often than
not, it's because I have gone and looked that up ahead of time before recording knowing that this
will be relevant to the conversation or what have you. So I have that already in mind. Although
sometimes, yeah, so in an interview when I'm just citing something off the cuff, it I often say,
well, I don't remember the episode number or I don't even remember the exact title, but something
like this. Anyway, but other than that, how do the connections work? And how do I remember things
and keep track of information? I, again, I don't know how to answer that question. It's just the
way my brain works. Question 51 comes from Marla. You are the best freedom writer that I know. Thank
you. I would like to improve my research writing documentation and reporting skills. Would you
ever offer an online class to be a better independent journalist? I could pay $800 for such a thing.
All right, thank you for that Marla. What a weirdly specific
number there. But no, I have no particular plan to do a journalism class. But I do have some
resources in the corporate report archives that'll cost you exactly $0. And I hope they
help. I think they can answer some of the questions. For example, how to research online solutions,
watch research resources. That's a particularly good one, by the way, in case people just want to
gloss over that. I went in depth into how I start beginning my search into a subject and
showing you literally step by step with things that I hadn't searched before just showing on screen.
This is what I do. And this is the way I look at information. And this is how I start to parse
things out. I think a valuable exploration for people who are really interested in that.
Research resources you should know about solutions, watch research tools you should
know about solutions, watch. Those are separate episodes with separate things. Make your own
newspaper solutions, watch. And episode two, eight, three on solutions, make your own media.
So I have several things in the archives that are of help there. And if there's any specific
questions that you have on specific things, send them in. And maybe that could be a future
questions for Corbett or solutions, watch. But I think that'll get you started anyway. And yeah,
you better believe those, those references, I definitely looked up before
recording this. So no, those aren't coming off the top of my head.
Question 52 comes from Berghard. In the light of a brand new translation of Einrand's Atlas
shrugged novel here in Germany, I entered Einrand in your search box. The search resulted in a
number of items, but nothing really seemed to refer to the controversial American author.
The publisher of the translation, a glowing Einrand fan who says that Atlas shrugged has
changed his life and his son's life, considers Einrand as a model of self determination,
much needed for our time and rejects the assertion that she justified laissez faire
capitalism and doesn't and don't care egoism with her philosophy. So what does James Corbett
think of Einrand or don't you simply not care? Don't you simply not care? Is that a double negative?
Anyway, okay, I think I understand what you mean. Well, I guess the perhaps this is not the the
in depth and thoughtful answer you're looking for. But a real answer is that yes, I did. I read,
was it Atlas shrugged or the fountain head? I don't even remember. But 20, maybe 25 years ago,
my god, I'm getting old. Anyway, something like 25 years ago, and maybe it's because
pretentious literary snob here, but it, oh, it was not a well written novel.
As a novelist, Einrand is a terrible writer. Let me assure you of that. If there's anything I'm
qualified to adjudicate on, it is that question. What does a guy have to do to get some objective
correlative? You know what I mean? But putting that to the side for the moment, I would also say,
yeah, I just wish if you're going to write philosophy and you're not a absolutely stellar
writer, just write philosophy. Stop shoehorning your philosophy into big 60 page monologues
by this man who is represented is there to represent free man. And then there's this bad
man who's there to represent collectivism. And it's just it's so shoehorned and so
obvious and beating you over the head with it. It's terrible, terrible writing, really, truly.
Anyway, that to the side. My overall impression from my interaction with Randheitz over the years,
so I never got deeply, deeply into Rand specifically. She is definitely not my path into
thinking about freedom in general. But I have met people like that along the way. And
my experience, take it from what it's worth. Randheitz seemed to me to be quite cliquey and
quite exclusive and quite, you know, you have to be part of our team and worship the Rand fountain
head or else you're not part of the club. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but Randheitz are
statists and believe in intellectual property, right? So right there, I have to give a pass.
That's not freedom to me. Anyway, it's not to throw out everything. I think there are
probably useful insights in Rand. But I personally, I don't study or I don't take her all that
seriously. I don't spend my time reading. I'm Rand. Terrible novels. Sorry to offend the
Randheitz in the crowd. Question 53 comes from Slurry. Hi, James. I remember you mentioning
that when everybody dropped their PayPal that you lost a bunch of subscribers support. Did any of
those people come back or are you still taking a hit? Thank you for the question, Slurry. More
people canceled PayPal than resubscribed. So once again, thank you to those who are subscribed,
who are literally making this report possible. I've said it a million times before. I presume I
will be saying it a million times. Hence, I cannot do this without you. So thank you to all the people
who did resubscribe or what have you. And just for clarification, because some people don't
quite understand what happened, PayPal did not kick me off. And I'm, I'm still, you can still
subscribe through PayPal if that's the way you want to subscribe. Don't care how just as long as you
do. You know, and a lot of people ditched PayPal. Great. It's an evil, horrible corporation. But
now they're going through Stripe or other evil, horrible corporations that will presumably censor
in the future as well when and if and as they can. So anyway, I don't think when we're dealing with
international money transfer, there's going to be clean hands in the corporate space. That's why
it would be great if we had some kind of decentralized network of people who could peer to
peer connect and trade some sort of currency directly. But that's just a pipe dream. Anyway,
so thank you for the questions, Larry. And the answer is, yeah, more people unsubscribed than
subscribed. Question 54 comes from Darth. Recently, I heard rumors around and people posting some
controversial aspects about you as being a gatekeeper. Could you make a public statement about
these rumors? All right, well, you might notice a common theme in a lot of these questions. How
do we trust you, James? Why should we trust you? Well, okay, all right. Well, first of all, I can't
really respond to rumors about me being a gatekeeper. That is just a rumor about me being a gatekeeper.
I mean, if there's a specific accusation, you know, maybe I can address that. But can I make a public
statement about these rumors? Sure. Here you go. Anyone who tells you never question anything is,
by definition, I would say your your enemy in some sense, your intellectual enemy at the very
least and should be treated as such. My message, accordingly, has always been and will always be
to do your own research quite explicitly. Do not believe what I'm saying. Please look at the sources.
And that's why I always list the sources on everything that I do.
For me, it's always been important to be able to triangulate information.
Because information you're getting from any one source is going to be tainted by whatever
that source has, consciously, unconsciously, open, covert, whatever. You don't know.
You don't know me. You know, I mean, I could be some secret agent trying to feed you propaganda,
which is why I've always been interested about putting show notes and links to everything that
I'm talking about. This is where I'm getting the information. This is it. Go look at that.
And I don't say that because, you know, that's my thing or something. No, I'd say that because that
is the point of what I'm doing. And which is why it's particularly disheartening to me that I know
that a lot of people don't click the links. All right, fair enough. A lot of people aren't
researching. A lot of people are just trying to, some people are just in it for conspiration.
Some people are interested just to hear I trust this guy. So whatever he says,
some people will click the links. But then I'll get feedback about, oh, did you see this video?
Do you see this documentary? Oh, this is so good. And I'll go and look at it. And it'll be
sometimes two hours of a narrator just saying, and this happened, and this person did this,
and this did that. And every point I'll be like, really? What? Where did you get that information?
Wait, that was your own editorial insertion there. I agree with that point. I agree with that point.
But then you came up with that. Where did that come from? And that's, that's something that I've
always tried to do with my work is to try to put those sources in so that people can get it something
closer to the truth. This is an example of a recent episode. It's a half hour to one hour
audio slash video documentary type exploration of a given subject. In this case, it was Rockefeller
Medicine exploring the Rockefeller Foundation's role in creating our modern concept of medicine.
And you see the text, kind of the description and the link to the YouTube version for people
who are still stuck on Google. And there you go. Underneath every single episode of my podcast,
there's a documentation list. Every time I mention a document, every time I play a video or play a
recording or what have you, I'll link to that in the show notes with the time index. So you hear
it on the podcast, you go look at the time, you go look it up in the show notes. There it is. You
can go read it for yourself. Because my entire premise is that I'm not really doing anything
other than presenting my opinion that's been gleaned from this and this and this and this and this
source. Go look it up for yourself and come to your own opinion. But if you value the work that
I'm doing, then yeah, continue to listen. Yeah, of course, I get this all the time. And look, no
one out there knows because how would you know? But I know I am not controlled opposition. I'm
not a shill. I'm not dancing to anyone's tune. I'm calling my own shots. So I know who I am.
I know I'm real. And I know I'm going to continue doing exactly what I do in the way that I do it
as long as I can. Because I know it is important that it is making a difference. But here's the
thing. That's me personally. I know this. You don't know this, as I say. Of course, that's what a
controlled opposition would say, isn't it? But this is the point. It is to get people to doubt
everyone and everything. Okay, fine. Doubt everyone. Be skeptical. Don't take anyone's word for it.
Please, literally, really, don't just accept what people are saying because they say it.
The bottom line of this particular PSYOP is to get people to accept the premise of all of this,
which is that you out there, you yourself, can only listen to other people and you only have to
do what other people are saying. And you and when somebody that you you assign trust, I trust
this person, this one's real and this one's fake. And so this person's this fake person saying this
thing, I don't like, oh, that can't be true. But this true person, this person I trust who's
saying this thing, well, then I'll believe it. And that's that's idiocy. That's stupidity. Does
anyone work that way? No, you, at the very least, you know that you are a real human being. You
know that you're not some controlled opposition, fake shell, whatever. So you decide you use your
own discernment to and to understand what is going on to take information on and see if you can
triangulate and and oh, does that make sense? And can I can I verify that thing? You become the
person who decides, okay, I'm gonna, I believe this, I think this is right. I think this is wrong.
And then you don't have to, it doesn't matter what control. Oh, that guy's controlled off that
guy's that guy's real. You don't have to take sides on all of this. You understand and you
internalize in your own way, the information you're taking on board and you move forward with that
information. And you're not, you don't have to be beholden to other gurus and and and constantly
deciding who is trustworthy and who isn't. You know what to do and you can go out there and do it.
So do not, I am not your leader. I am not your guru. I am not asking you to believe me. I am not.
Do not follow me in that sense. I am saying, follow my example. I'm not out here calling,
oh, that guy's a controlled chill and oh, that guy's real deal. I know when I see information
that I can triangulate that I know is true and that resonates. Okay, that's, I believe that.
And I'm going to go out there and promote that idea because I think that's a good idea.
That's what we should all be doing individually.
I trust that that makes it clear enough. But just in case it doesn't, let me reiterate for the
500th time, or is it the 5000th who's keeping track? Don't trust me, bro.
Don't believe it because James Corbett said it. I've never said that and I never will.
It's the tagline of CorbettReport.com, open source intelligence news because
it was baked into the cake from day one. Open source information. When I read an article,
when I play a video clip, when I quote someone, I'm going to link you to the original source
of that material so that you can see it for yourself. Am I quoting it correctly? Am I quoting
it in context? Am I missing out some other piece of the puzzle that changes things drastically?
Well, you get to decide for yourself because I have faith in you and your own critical thinking
faculty, your ability to determine for yourself what information you think is true and accurate,
what you think is false and misleading, what you think is relevant, what you think is irrelevant,
what you think is being excluded. That's up to you. And there's no outside entity that can or
should ever try to subsume your own intellectual sovereignty. So yeah, whatever. It's the internet.
I mean, if I'm not called a gatekeeper 57 times before 9am, then it's a slow day. So
who cares? I'm going to continue doing what I do. And I hope all of you out there continue
doing what you do, which is acting as free individual sovereign human beings and taking
it as your own responsibility. And yes, there is work involved in that, but taking it as your own
responsibility to be responsible for what information you are taking on board and what you
aren't and looking at sources, researching for yourself, thinking for yourself in whatever way
you want, coming to whatever conclusions that you want. And I allow you to do so. If you need
some outside figure to allow you to do your own research, think for yourself and come to
different conclusions. I'll allow it. But that's the entire problem here is people transferring
their intellectual sovereignty onto someone else and making it their responsibility. You didn't
tell me that thing that is relevant to my life. Stop playing stupid games. Stop winning stupid
prizes. Anyway, thank you for allowing me to expand and expound on that, Darth. But let's move on to
the next question. Question 55 comes from Jay. I'm from India and I've been living in Canada since
2013. I do food deliveries for a living. I discovered your work during this so-called pandemic.
I've learned a lot from your podcasts and documentaries. I've been thinking about
starting a podcast as a side project to collect, organize and store all the things I learned
listening to different podcasts, watching YouTube videos, reading news articles and more. I'd be
very grateful if you could provide information regarding your production process. How do you
create audio clips, video clips? How do you organize your show notes before recording an episode?
What tools, software do you use for your podcast editing? All right, thank you for the question,
Jay, or questions, but we'll count it as one. As you can imagine, I receive this type of question
on a regular basis in many permutations. And so there are a couple of things in the Corbett
Report Archives that I think will be of relevance to you. One is Corbett Report Radio 149 on how
to create the Corbett Report. And the other is the aforementioned episode 283 of the Corbett
Report Podcast proper on solutions. Make your own media where video editor extraordinaire,
Brock West was here in Japan, and he was asking questions that we collected from the audience
about my media production process, and I was answering them. The big asterisk on those productions,
I think they're both over a decade old by now, so maybe a bit technologically updated, but I think
there's still information in there that's useful and relevant. If people do have questions about
the latest microphones and cameras and software and what have you, send it in, and if there is
enough interest, then maybe next time Brock is in Japan or I'm in Vietnam, maybe we can do a follow-up
to make your own media. But I would caution with this type of question, and I don't know if this
applies to you in particular, Jay, but I think sometimes people might ask this question as a type
of perhaps subconscious mental trick of trying to excuse procrastination or just never doing anything
at all. As in, oh, you know, I want to do this and I'll put this information out and I'll make a
podcast, but I don't know if I have the right microphone, I don't know what software to do,
I don't really know what I'm doing, I don't think it'll sound that great. And then they just defer
it off, oh, you know, once I have it all figured out, then I can do my podcast. I don't think
that's a good way to go. At least for myself, when I was starting out, I knew I had those
perfectionistic tendencies and I could let them get in the way of me actually doing anything,
so I made the conscious mental decision, I don't know what I'm doing, I'm going to do it anyway.
And if you go back to episode one, that becomes quite apparent. Yeah, it's terrible production
quality. But hey, it's just a regular guy who's passionate about what he's talking about and
I just started putting it out there and doing it and doing it and doing it and doing it and
hopefully improving along the way. I'd like to think I've upped my media game in the past 16 years.
Hey, I'm now in 1080p webcam. Woo. Welcome to the 21st century, James. Took you long enough, but
yeah. And that's another thing to think about with regards to this question. What level of media
production are you looking to attain here? You should keep that in mind because like with the
Corbett Report, I am not trying to compete with the Fox News and CNNs of the world. I don't need a
million dollar set and tens of thousands of dollars of lights and cameras and makeup artists
making up bimbo info bimbos and whatever to read the news to you. That's not the audience that I'm
going for. That's not the media production I need to create. So does everyone need to see my
every pore on my face and crystal clear 8k quality? Probably not. Probably not. Probably
wouldn't make that much of a difference to the Corbett Report. So know what it is you're doing
and just get out there and do it. Learn by doing. That was the whole point of the auto
didacticism conversation I had with Richard Grove last year on Solutions Watch. I am a
believer in it because that's why you're listening to me at all right now. Next questions come from
Whitley. Question 56. I was wondering how do you manage all of the knowledge you have on a vast
array of subjects? Which I think we saw a permutation of this question before and once again,
I just I don't know how to answer this question. Doesn't your brain work this way?
57. Do you use some sort of note taking or second brain system like Obsidian? Nope.
Don't use Obsidian. Don't use the brain. Don't use any of this other software for collecting and
organizing notes and what have you. The closest I can give you is the highlighter is mightier than
the sword, which is a Solutions Watch episode from last year. And about halfway through that video,
I show the act of me saving an article to my hard drive. In that case, I think a Ukraine
article that I was researching at the time. And you can see the directory structure in which
I save it. This is a Ukraine article. I'll save it in the Ukraine folder. It's not rocket science.
And that's about the extent of my organization. Even that I don't use that very much when I'm
doing my research and writing for my my brain the way it works. I think it's the act of saving it
to my hard drive that helps me to remember that it's there. So your mileage will vary if Obsidian
or whatever else works for you. Great. But I don't use it myself. Question 58 comes from Amber.
I've been watching your videos for over a decade now and I've noticed recently that you have a
growing collection of guitars. Yeah. Is there a chance you'd give us a concert anytime soon?
Amber. I thought you'd never ask. Yes, of course. For people who don't know, and you should by now,
I'm in a band. It's called KodomoSan. Our music is available for free listening pleasure at any
time at KodomoSan.com. And you should go there if you're interested. But since you asked nicely,
I could regale you with a chanson or two. Let's speaking of microphones and cameras and stuff.
Let me let me see if you can actually see my guitar and see me. This is a delicate balancing act.
All right. And let's see if I can get in focus. I'm over here camera. Okay, there we go. And let's
see if we're in tune. I'll take it. All right, everybody. Again, I'm getting out of focus.
You're focusing on this microphone, are you? It is listening on. Hello.
Ladies and gentlemen, please rise for the Japanese National Anthem.
Yeah.
All right.
Forgive me, guys. It's early in the morning. It's too early for music.
But no, actually, I put those mistakes in on purpose.
So you'd know I'm not overdubbing some studio ace on top of my plane.
Although, actually, that's not a bad idea.
Brock, dub a Tim Henson lick over this, please.
All right.
James, why does your acoustic guitar sound like a plugged-in electric?
You wouldn't understand.
All right.
I'll tell you what. I'll tell you what I'll play for you.
I will play for you the second ever song that I wrote.
It is called The Experiment, and I won't explain it because I think it speaks for itself.
The Experiment, ladies and gentlemen, and it goes exactly like this.
Don't you see he said the man with the wires in his hands?
Don't you know what we'll discover when we finish our brain scans?
Now of course you don't.
Not to be too unkind, but the science of our mind
is better left up to the experts of the process
that they find in their white lab coats.
The duck got interrupted, all the sockets get corrupted,
and the duck scratched his face as an apple.
He erupted like a told-the-joke.
My dear friend, let Nick be in bed.
This is all over your head.
If you continue to shout, you will scare our foreseeable hand,
and we could have that.
So we turn on the machine and he made my face a beam,
and I felt my mind restraining as the pigs started to scream,
like a grown man.
Five, four, three, two, one.
Grab your partner, dozy-do, I will take you toe-toe.
Funniest thing you ever did, see?
That scientist is chasing me.
I will take him all around with two feet of other ground.
I'm a man, I'm a man, I will take him all around with two feet of other ground.
I'm a man, I'm a man.
How will you bring me to my place?
How will you bring me to my place?
All right, thank you, thank you very much.
That's a little diddy from Capricorn One.
Our first album, and we're currently in the studio working on an EP.
So thank you, Amber, for allowing me to have a little fun there,
and KotomoSan.com for those who are interested.
Keeping it on a musical note, let's go to question 59 from Tom.
So here's a fab and gear thread for you.
My intuition slash spirit slash soul,
aka the still small voice, guided me, like out of nowhere, so I know it's from somewhere,
to listen to George's All Those Years Ago and read lyrics along with it.
That was an Awakener All Over again, by the way.
Then I strolled to When We Was Fab, same.
Then at the tail end of fab, there's a female voice clip.
Sounded like a female talking head journal at first.
I cranked the volume for the new headphones and listened closer.
It might be Yoko or an Indian woman.
I can only figure out, understand, a few words, phrases.
I then searched it on the interweb, re-wording my search five ways to Sunday to no avail.
So I'm including you in my quest, Sir Knight.
Have you come across any articles or research or anyone in the interview even asking about
who it is speaking and what they're saying?
I'm still searching.
I was hoping you had some contacts.
I don't.
Hello, George.
So far, nothing in any articles about the song or interviews with George mentions the
voice clip at the end.
When We Was Fab, right at the end, just before it fades out,
satars abound, you know the bit, wink, wink.
Thanks in advance, my friend.
All right.
Thank you, Tom, for the abolient and fun question there.
But to immediately puncture your bubble.
Although, as you may or may not know, I am a Beatles aficionado and I do know quite a bit
about the recording history and the daily ins and outs of the Beatles and their ove.
And I do know quite a bit about John Lennon's biography and his solo work.
I know a little bit about Paul.
I know very little about George.
So I have heard When We Was Fab maybe a couple times in my life.
Didn't think much about it.
Certainly have no idea what voice you're talking about.
Never really listened to it before.
So let's give it a listen.
No, sorry, Tom, off the top of my ear.
I certainly didn't catch that.
So I have no idea.
Let's let's ask Vinnie Caggiano about this.
Say, I got a question for you.
You do.
That's unusual.
Do you know George Harrison's When We Was Fab?
I don't know it.
I mean, I've heard it before, but I haven't played it.
So you off the top of your head wouldn't know what that weird voice that you can almost kind
of hear of some woman speaking that is in kind of the background at the very end as the sitars
are swirling around.
You don't happen to know what that is.
I have no idea.
In fact, I didn't know that existed.
Nope.
Sorry.
Sorry to be of no use whatsoever, but I haven't done any research on this.
So if there are any people in the crowd who happen to know any of this particular trivia
of this voice clip and what it is and where it comes from, please let us know.
I if I come across it in my travels and travails across the interwebs, I will let you know, Tom.
But sorry, can't be of help today.
Let's move on to question 60 question from Andy.
We are all Alex Jones today.
He certainly has his flaws, but $1 billion, obviously referring to the recent billion
dollar settlement thing with Sandy Hook and all that.
I noticed some of the evidence they used against him was the words of his callers.
How do we know those callers were not agents?
Good question.
We don't.
Question 61 comes from Dantini.
Well, less of a question, more of a warning.
Back on interview 1761, he left this comment in which he said,
Tomorrow is the date to be watchful for.
116 equals 66 and 2022 equals 6.
Together equals 666.
You may shrug shoulders, but tomorrow you won't.
Expect damage by nukes, dirty bombs, ectetera.
I'm sorry, you know that is my particular grammatical pep皮, right?
Anyway.
All right, you heard it here first, folks.
November 6, 2022 is the date to be watchful for.
The numerology never lies, I tell you.
All right.
Thank you, Dantini.
Question 62 comes from Cornelia.
Hi, not sure if I'm currently subscribed.
Could you check please?
And if I'm not subscribed, I will rectify this immediately and subscribe.
Thank you, Cornelia, for being up on that.
I appreciate that.
However, it shouldn't.
Hopefully you don't have to.
Hopefully you will know if you are paying me money or not.
At the very least, you check your bank statements and things, right?
At any rate, for people who are similarly curious as to whether or not they're subscribed,
well, first of all, when you subscribe, you should get an email from me with your
login info and a link to the welcome video and all that.
If you don't have that, please let me know.
I'm happy to send it or resend it.
But for anyone who is subscribed via Stripe, there is a link, and sure, Brock,
throw it on screen, but I'll put it in the show notes so that you can take it down.
There's a link that you can use, and from that link, you'll be able to
see your subscription to the corporate report and change and update your card details and
whatever else you need to do.
Cancel if you want to.
Via Substack, I think you have to go through Substack itself,
log into your account there, and you can see who you're subscribed to,
and you can change, update, cancel, whatever.
Via PayPal, again, you can do it through your own PayPal account, and there is a link,
a help article that walks you through that.
Again, you can change, you can update, you can cancel if you want to.
So it's all there, and you should be able to do it yourself, but if there is ever any question,
please just let me know.
I'm happy to help, and I can do it on my side and confirm for you.
Question 63 comes from Randy.
What can you conjure up about what we can all expect if, when the CBDC actually takes effect?
I was in Italy when the Euro took over the lira, and it was like 100% price hike overnight.
Yes, Randy, thank you for that.
Yeah, I think, all right, I think the smart move, if I was a smart tyrant,
desiring control over the people, is to go slow, roll things out gradually, and
introduce CBDC as a supplement to all the other ways you can pay.
They're not going away, but here's the CBDC thing.
It's the kind of cool, trendy thing, but maybe it's too cool for you.
Just stick to your old, fuddy-duddy ways, and if you want, you can download this app, and
you can play a little with the CBDC, but don't worry, there's spending limits on it and everything.
We're not replacing anything, and gradually lower people in, oh, you know,
you can get a 10% discount if you use CBDC, or whatever it is, and then lower the hammer on them.
But, having said that, I don't think these people have, these would-be tyrants have
proven themselves to be smart in any sense.
I think they're idiots and megalomaniacs, so they'll probably try some dramatic,
false flag bank run, bank collapse scenario.
Oh my God, the banks are closed, and when they open, it will all be CBDC,
and you must take this digital currency.
Some sort of dramatic, false flag kind of thing like that.
It's in the cards.
Who knows how it's going to happen?
I don't know, but there's lots of different ways, and as I would like to stress again and again,
CBDCs, there's a lot more to this than sort of the one thing that people are thinking of,
that it's going to be this all-or-nothing currency that's going to arrive all at once.
There's many ways this can be done, and it could be done retail or wholesale,
and it could be done through middleman financial institutions, or through the central bank directly,
or some other rigmarole, and there's a lot of hocus pocus that they will throw at you,
and when it doesn't look exactly like that nightmare scenario that you're imagining,
well then, hey you crazy conspiracy theorist, you were hyperventilating about nothing.
Well, actually no, the entire infrastructure is all behind the scenes.
It's just that you don't get to see it on your day-to-day level, or whatever.
Anyway, I just want people to be aware of that.
CBDCs beyond the basics is the research tool for you to use along those lines.
All right, let's move on to question 64, which comes in from E, who writes,
EarthNow is partnering with Gates on EarthNow satellites.
Are they in effect now? I want to go fishing and hope to enjoy some privacy in the great outdoors.
Yeah, for people who missed that story, I think it was 2018,
EarthNow, some company came along with a seed funding round that included investors like Bill Gates,
promising, hey guys, we're going to put up this satellite network that's going to 24-7
continuously video monitor every square inch of the planet.
I don't think that was at least the long-term game plan,
and they were starting to raise money for that, and Bill Gates did contribute to it.
However, according to the founders LinkedIn, EarthNow went bust in 2019,
so I guess they didn't proceed past the initial seed funding round.
Take that for what it's worth, is it really gone?
At any rate, I highly suspect that some EarthNow-like project is in the works by some other company
that's just, they realized, oh, maybe a little too much press here,
because if you do type it in, you will see a lot of the coverage at the time.
Bill Gates wants to monitor the Earth, kind of thing.
So maybe that was a little too much publicity,
and maybe they've gone a little more undercover.
At any rate, I'm sure SpaceX, Musk, and his DoD millions, billions of contracts is
sending up all sorts of satellite new Hickory up there to do all sorts of monitoring that
we're not allowed to know about, but Musk certainly is involved in.
So, at any rate, yeah, EarthNow, as far as I know, is defunct,
but I don't think the idea is defunct, unfortunately.
Go fishing, go fishing anyway, but yeah, be aware that things are afoot.
Question 65 comes from Sotiris.
Hi, James, I have watched the majority of your videos,
and I don't recall any mention of intellectual property within voluntarism.
Are they mutually exclusive in your opinion?
Would love your opinion, thanks.
Well, yes, thank you, yeah, that's a good question.
I don't know if I have mentioned that specifically in the past,
at least in terms of my voluntarism,
but obviously, as people know, I am against the concept of intellectual property,
and I do think it is incompatible with the concept of voluntary free association,
because what is intellectual property?
What is copyright?
What is trademark?
What are these things?
They are government-granted monopolies on the use of information.
So I don't see how that could be compatible with the system
that does not recognize the authority of government.
I mean, it is government monopoly.
That is where trade, patents, and copyright came from,
and is explicitly what they originated as.
So yeah, anyway, in case you don't know, IP is a myth.
Please see my podcast episode on Please Steal This Podcast
for more information on that.
And hey, I do a rendition of IP freely there,
if you want some more of my music.
All right, question 66 comes from Job, who writes,
I watched one of your items about Trump from 2017,
and noticed the black cube with your logo popping up on the screen.
Of course, I saw it before in other videos,
but then never realized what it could mean.
So my question is, why do you use the black cube?
For I have learned that it has occult uses.
All right, Job, what an interestingly biblical name.
The answer is because it looks good.
It's an easy way of presenting the title
and sort of logo of the site,
and what type of podcast you're watching in a visual way.
This is a news trope that a lot of news will use,
and hey, it looks good, it's convenient, it makes a point.
So are cubes out?
Because let's add it to the list, because cubes are out,
obviously, because it's the Saturn alien cult or whatever.
And circles are the eye of Horus,
and triangles, of course, it's the capstone of the pyramid.
So basically, all of the most basic shapes
of the human visual vocabulary are out,
because they're all occult now,
because the occult has taken them over.
Do you see the problem of this?
Okay, let me first state for the record,
no, the black cube thing idea is not some sort of,
I'm bowing down and worshiping the Saturn alien cult,
and I'm not some Satan worshiper or something
because I have a black cube.
That's not what that's about.
I realize, okay, there's occult uses to this.
That's not what I'm doing.
Are we going to allow the occultists to take
the most basic shapes and visual representations
in human productive visual experience and make that,
oh, okay, that's all occult, so we can't use any of that.
Am I allowed to put a stick man?
Can I have that as my logo?
No, because that's like Da Vinci's man thing, right?
No, and he was an occultist.
So, hmm, no, I guess all form of visual representation
is out at the window now.
No, of course not.
Let's not let them do that.
Because if I write a song about Saturnalia
trying to call out the human sacrifices,
does that mean that I am part of the satanic cult
that's worshiping Saturnalia?
No, I think we have to be discerning
about these types of things and whether people can use them
or if they, we should just consign squares and circles
and everything else to the dustbin of history
because they've been co-opted.
No, I am, I'm going to use it
because it does not represent any of that to me.
Anyway, just for the record, no.
Question 67, question from Shelley.
How is the public feeling about Japan's
military spending increase of 22%?
Public, what do you think?
They are unhappy.
Question 68, question from Andrew.
I'm curious about the participants at this event,
which consisted of 10 current and former health ministers
and senior public health officials
from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore,
India, Germany, as well as Bill Gates.
And then he has a link to the Center for Health Security
and an exercise that they were running.
And he asks, I'm trying to see a connection
between these eight participating countries,
but I can't speak.
I can't find one.
Any ideas?
Okay, thank you for the question, Andrew.
Yes, for people who don't know.
Catastrophic contagion, everyone.
Question 70, question 78.
Officials in two Latin American countries
alerted the WHO of several outbreaks of a new,
infectious disease that's mysteriously appearing
across the region.
Severe epidemic entravirus respiratory syndrome 2025.
Over the past six weeks alone,
there have been 500 confirmed or suspected cases reported.
The virus could cause a severe pandemic
if early containment and mitigation efforts
are not successful.
The pandemic in this type of situation and trend
would be a risk for the global health security.
Pandemics are inherently political, financial
and so much broader.
We have not spoken on the leadership
in a country.
And I think that we need to be also very careful.
Yes, catastrophic contagion, everyone.
And yes, that really did happen.
And yes, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security
in partnership with the WHO and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
did conduct a pandemic tabletop exercise
at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium
on October 23rd, 2022.
And yes, they were simulating and globally spreading
enterovirus outbreak, which disproportionately kills
children, but relax, everybody.
The Reuters fact checkers have swooped in to determine
that this was all a fictional thing.
So there's nothing to worry about, guys.
It's like that event 201 thing with the coronavirus plushies.
Don't trouble your little heads about it.
Anyway, yeah, the bulk of your question here,
why those particular countries, I can only speculate,
but certainly the African countries represented there
does seem to dovetail in with the whole Ebola-Marburg
hype of the past decade, which was part of the setting
of the table for the scandemic.
So that seems natural enough, I would say,
for a simulation like this.
Germany seems like a NATO representative at the table.
Also just happens to be, according to the latest figures
I've seen, the largest single donor to the WHO at this point.
And Gates, well, duh, CorbettReport.com slash Gates,
everyone, if you need more on that story.
And for what it's worth, according to the latest numbers,
apparently the second largest donor to the WHO at the moment.
As for India and Singapore, yeah, good question.
I don't know why those countries specifically
doesn't ring a bell off the top of my head
why they would be in there.
Maybe something planned for that region.
Maybe they're not, maybe diversity and inclusion, who knows.
We could speculate, but I wouldn't waste too much time
speculating about such things unless and until retroactively
catastrophic contagion is shown to be an event 201 type scenario
that is of significance.
And then you can go back and see perhaps why that was.
I'm not sure speculating at this point will yield much fruit.
If anyone knows off the top of their head exactly
why India and Singapore are at that table.
But maybe there is no particular reason.
Maybe we're living through a repeat of the 2002,
three, four, five era of the war of terror
where people were rightly concerned about all of these
terror simulations and exercises
because it could be the next false flag.
And there were many, many, many, many, many
such exercises that played out
that didn't turn out to be the next false flag.
So this may be one of those in the biosecurity era
that we're living through right now.
All right, question 69 comes from Joshua.
James, I think I just spotted a trend
which has determined whether in the course
of a fourth turning conflict,
the side that was fighting for liberty
against despotism emerged victorious or was vanquished.
When it was fighting mostly to break free
from the bonds of some old established system of state,
liberty has been defeated.
When it was also fighting to realize
some revolutionary new system of governance,
institution of mediation,
or even a method of waging war, liberty has been victorious.
And yet during this particular fourth turning,
the forces of despotism have been employing
a globally coordinated, many multi-vectored,
starfish, beets, spider, salt-the-earth style
of warfare towards erecting radical,
never before attempted matrices of governance and control,
systems of financial and monetary regulation,
and re-engineering the human genome.
I suppose any alternate systems we're considering
should be equally well-imagined,
precisely defined and encompassing,
yet decentralized, as well as new and revolutionary
with a healthy dose of retro.
What do you think?
Agreed.
Make it so, Joshua.
Question seven, he comes from Steve.
Where is Christian Westbrook, aka Ice Age Farmer?
Yeah, good question.
I don't know, as people may have seen.
He hasn't posted anything for, I don't know,
a year and a half or longer at this point.
But I don't know Christian Westbrook.
I interviewed him precisely once.
So that's the entirety of my contact with him.
I don't have any special contact for him.
And I don't know.
I don't know.
I'm not my brother's keeper.
I don't have the podcaster bat phone.
Hello, Joe Rogan.
Get me Christian Westbrook on the phone.
It doesn't work that way.
So I don't know.
I'm assuming when and if he is able to pop up
and say something, he will.
And if anyone knows, let us know.
Question 71, question from Patrick.
Am I dumb and blind, or didn't you implement
a possibility to search your site?
Well, Patrick, I've got some bad news for you.
Question 72, question from Gavin M.
Didn't James Evan Pallotto move recently?
Do you know if he's in New Mexico now or somewhere else?
Yeah, good question.
Where could I possibly go to determine
whether James Evan Pallotto of mediamonarchy.com
has a postal address in New Mexico?
Oh, I know.
How about mediamonarchy.com?
Sorry to be sarcastic, but if you ever have a question
like that, the first place to go would be
to someone's website and see, oh, yes,
there's the New Mexico address,
which we provide every week on New World Next Week,
which is also linked up on my membership page
for people who are looking to send
check or money order in for subscription.
So yes, he is in New Mexico.
The postal address is there for people looking to contact him.
Question 73 from Little Bird.
Production question, was the extra audio
at the end of New World Next Week 507 intentional?
No, no, it wasn't.
And I think that was my mistake.
I think it was a mistake when I was rendering that video out.
So, miocopa.
But no, not intentional.
Question 74, question from Ron.
Hi, James, there's a black book on your bookshelf,
nearly always behind your right ear on your broadcasts.
It has EF in what looks like gold lettering beneath BE,
or possibly GE above.
I'm interested in finding out what this book's title is.
Yes, yes, I think I've rearranged the shelf recently,
so it's moved, but you are referring to this book.
And you're not the only one.
It is interesting to me how many people have emailed me
over the years about this book in particular.
Oops, I just spoiled the punchline.
Yes, this book, which of course is The Rockefellers
and American Dynasty by Collier and Horowitz.
I will link up the archive.org version,
so you can go read it if you're interested.
There's some important info in here,
some things that they got from original research
and interviews and what have you.
If you're interested in Big Oil and getting deeper
into that story, there's some stuff in here.
It's obviously a bit mainstream,
but some stuff worth noting.
Anyway, it's interesting that book in particular
seems to catch the eye of many people.
So there it is on the record,
and no one will ever ask me that again.
Question 75 from Vadoom.
At the very beginning of this interview,
interview 1643, where I'm getting this question from,
Allison says,
we're just waiting for him to get into the green room.
What?
James, I thought we were watching you
in the little apartment that you've shown from the outside,
and imagerizes of someone who calls himself James
doing a selfie video while walking in the park,
but actually walking on a treadmill
a fan blows occasional gusts into his hair,
no, into the mic, while in the otherwise empty room
a camera is before him, while a green curtain
hangs on the wall just behind.
Could it be in a bunker in Antarctica?
Or maybe she was just using a show mid-term casually.
Yeah, thank you for the question, Vadoom.
Yeah, let's use process of elimination here.
The ex-MSM, or Allison Moreau,
who is interviewing me there,
maybe she was using the showbiz term
for waiting area,
which, by the way,
is the same term that StreamYard,
I think, uses for their backstage area
before you bring someone on screen.
It's the green room, right?
But no, no, no.
No, of course not.
You got me.
I'm in a bunker in Antarctica
getting into a green screen room
so I can protect a pretty messy room behind me.
I mean, after all,
have you ever seen me wheel over
and pick a book off the bookshelf
or pick up one of those guitars?
I don't think so.
It's clearly all a green screen.
Anyway, question 76 comes from Margaret.
Dear James, I've been working a bit
doing transcribing with Sonic.ai.
If I do some more,
would you be interested in having them for your site?
And question 77, relatedly, comes from Julian.
Please!
The Corbett Report should be available in Spanish too.
Content is amazing,
and I believe it would smash our brains.
We have nothing like this on our language,
and I'm really interested
in translating anything you allow me to.
Well, good news, guys.
You don't need me to allow you to do anything.
If you want to transcribe or translate any of my work,
great, go for it.
It is Creative Commons 4.0,
so please get out there, transcribe,
translate, spread it to the four wins,
post it everywhere.
The only thing I ask is,
link back to the original, please,
and don't sell my stuff as your own work.
And obviously, don't try to sell it,
but other than that,
you're free to copy it and spread it to the four wins.
So that's good.
And transcriptions are always welcome,
and if they're nicely edited and don't take a bunch of work,
then I'd be happy to throw them on the original post.
And translations are also, of course, welcome.
If you want to either submit a translation
or if you have a channel or a blog
or somewhere where you post it up,
consult my Translate the Truth episode of Solutions Watch
for more on what you can do with that.
Question 78 comes from Mark.
I highly regard your work.
Have you ever considered doing research
slash documentary on Flat Earth versus Globerth?
I feel like if anyone can put that one to rest,
it is you.
I thank you for the vote of confidence, Mark.
Let me see.
Yep, yeah, it looks around to me.
All right, there we go.
I guess that settles that.
Question 79, Q from St. Fluffy.
Hi, James.
Saw spouts of water coming from deserts,
but also huge amounts from Japan.
Any ideas why we having so many water spouts,
especially in deserts, but also in your lovely Japan?
Take care, St. Fluffy.
Thank you for the question, St. Fluffy.
I genuinely have no idea what you are asking.
Question 80 comes from Emily.
Did you happen to notice the theme of the Super Bowl
ads this year that showed the huge class divide?
In the course of two hours,
we were told we don't work, Dunkin' Donuts.
We are weird, Mayo commercial.
We like, we look like flamingos, T-Mobile,
and we need to get back in the kitchen, popcorners.
JLo even mentions to grab her a glazed donut on Ben's way out,
as if the rich are entitled
and anyone can just walk off their jobs.
Am I the only one who noticed this?
Nobody's talking about it online.
Yeah, okay, good question.
It's probably, I take your word it's there,
but I did stop watching Super Bowl commercials
at the point when I stopped watching propaganda
and propaganda watch.
So I haven't looked at a single Super Bowl commercial
since Brock subjected me to those ones
from a couple of years ago.
That's in the archives if you're interested,
just type Super Bowl into my search
and you can watch those.
Watch me squirm watching that propaganda.
It's probably there, but hey,
the propaganda only has an effect
if you're watching it, right?
If you're not even watching it,
it's not going to affect you and your mind anyway.
Questions from David, question 81.
Just a thought.
Putin was a WEF young global leader.
What if a limited nuclear exchange occurred?
Could this be the rationale to bring in a world government?
Yes, question 82.
Also, I would like to hear your comments
on Sai Hirsch's report on Nord Stream.
Do you think this is a limited hangout?
All right, thank you for the question.
I don't take Hirsch's or anyone else's
secret anonymous sources seriously.
Trust me, bro.
And neither should you.
Remember, they really did get Osama guys
and they threw his body parts out of the helicopter
on their way back to base for no apparent reason.
So yeah, no, I don't.
Sai, trust me, bro.
Hirsch is not the person I turn to to tell me things.
It doesn't mean he's wrong.
In fact, I think Nord Stream was a false flag
of some sort and undoubtedly had American intelligence
and other intelligence involved in it.
Sure, I believe that to be the case.
I just, I don't rely on Sai Hirsch to tell me that.
Question 83, question from Elsid.
Just viewed for the first time, episode 232,
AIG exposed, a belter.
Next stop, the rest of the linked interview
with Richard Grove, who was running late to work
on the morning of 9-11.
Question, what is that funky tune
that episode 232 plays out with?
The good stuff happened to me
because I'm with USAA now.
To my surprise, everyone is jealous of me
because I called USAA now.
We only get the first verse,
which is humorously on point,
and now I'm hanging for the rest of the song.
Gotta keep the toes tapping in these times.
Yes, yes we do, Elsid,
so I'm glad the song was relevant and on point.
Not surprised you couldn't find it.
It is not a mainstream popular song.
It is called, or at least it's on YouTube
under the title, Insurance Song.
On the Music Is Life-esque YouTube channel
with 12 subscribers.
So this is a song for the USAA original song competition,
Rough Mixed by Beats for Everybody.
So anyway, there you go.
The link will be in the show notes,
so you can listen to that song to your heart's content.
Thank you for the question.
Question 84, question from Mary.
Some in my Freedom Cell Network
are debating about the evilness of QR codes.
Some think they understand how they work.
I don't yet.
Catherine Austin-Fitz has multiple times suggested
to stay away from them,
so I was wondering if you've written something about them,
how they work, pros and cons,
maybe some magic words to find some more info about them.
Yeah, good call back to the magic words of Solutions Watch.
All right, I haven't written specifically on QR codes before,
but that does remind me.
I did want to put in a Solutions Watch at some point
the idea of taking a marker
and just putting in some extra dots in a QR code here and there,
some easy mischief that might throw some gears in the works there.
So I'm not sure if QR codes themselves are inherently evil,
but they certainly do facilitate evil purposes, don't they?
And they make it more technologically efficient
to do things that would have been unimaginable before.
Like, you've got to scan the QR code on your smartphone
to check in when you go visit someplace
to make sure that you're not one of the dirty people,
the unvaxxed or whatever.
Yeah, so clearly it facilitates a lot of the biosecurity agenda
and that's why I think we should be concerned
about QR codes and their implementation.
And the fact that they can be used
to essentially bar people from public life.
You don't have a smartphone, you can't scan the QR code,
then you can't enter this public space or whatever it is.
So yes, there are reasons to be wary of it,
even though I don't think the technology itself is inherently evil
and you can use QR codes.
I mean, hey, put the corporateport.com link as a QR code
and then post it places and see who scans in to see the website
and learn something new.
Who knows?
It could be used for good, but generally it isn't, right?
Question 85 from Daniel.
I'm just realizing this is a repeat question.
I wanted to ask about the Seymour Hirsch revelations
about Nord Stream and what you have to say about it.
Well, see a few questions ago.
There you go, I get so many questions.
I can hardly keep track.
86, question from Frank.
I often hear and feel we're in the middle of a great awakening,
but perhaps this is just my experience.
In 2020, I moved to a country town in Western Australia
and just about all my new friends
are aware of the various agendas at play.
But could this just be a case of like attracts like?
If so, that would make sense.
I'm a friendly, gregarious person
and feel I've quickly found my tribe in Margaret River.
All that said, is there an empirical way
we can measure success of the awakening?
And is there any evidence that reaching
a critical mass of awakened souls
could stop these agendas in their tracks?
I've seen memes claiming we only need 10 to 20%
of truly awakened people to turn this thing around.
Yeah, I don't know, trust the memes, right?
Is there an empirical way of finding this out?
The only empirical thing that we could do
is to look throughout history
and try to determine, I mean,
that's where the whole 3%er thing comes from, right?
It's only 3% of the American public
were made, they pushed the American Revolution
through to its completion, right?
Or so they say, but actually,
the fat checkers will come along to tell you,
well, that underestimates how many people
were actually resisting the prediction, blah, blah, blah.
So I'm not sure if we can even necessarily
glean it from the historical record.
I'm not sure.
I mean, are you looking for me to tell you
a precise number and then precisely
how to measure that number at any moment?
All I know is they are lying to you
at all times in the media about
how fringe a crazy conspiracy wingnut you are
and nobody supports you.
No one believes what you believe.
Meanwhile, everyone else around you
is hearing the same message and thinking,
well, I better keep to myself.
So I think there are more people than are realized.
And I do think there is some critical mass
at which point the enslavement grid will not be possible.
But it also involves people not only reaching that mass,
but doing something, implementing something,
changing their life.
That is the point at which we will see real change.
So there's a lot that goes into that.
I'm sorry I can't give you a number.
Question 87 comes from InsectInPixel,
who asks, where can I get a no rulers hoodie?
Yes, asking the important question.
So people might have seen my no rulers hoodie.
I've worn on the podcast a few times.
It's from Liberty Maniacs.
And I will link that up in the show notes.
Please support Dan McCall over at Liberty Maniacs.
Please get the literally no rulers hoodie.
Question 88, question from Fabrice.
Is it fair to say that the globalist elites
become more overt and brazen during the COVID saga?
Or was I just asleep for so long?
Yes.
Question 89 from Norbert.
Have you thought of the possibility
that our recent weather extremes
have something to do with geoengineering?
Yes, search geoengineering on CorbettReport.com.
That doesn't change the fact that weather extremes
are actually generally decreasing.
And even the World Meteorological Organization
admits that weather events are less deadly now
than 50 years ago,
but are just being over reported
to hype the climate change narrative.
All of that being said.
But yes, can specific events be caused
by geoengineering?
Of course.
And I have talked about that in the past.
Question 90 comes from Leaf.
Can you please tell me what episode to start with?
Or how I might navigate your past episodes
in some sort of chronological order?
I have spent the last year listening
to all of Richard Groves' tragedy and hope podcasts
starting with his first episode
and working my way through them all.
Can you tell me how I might do something similar with yours?
I can't seem to figure out a starting point
with your episodes.
Yes, go to CorbettReport.com.
Go to the audio tab.
Go to podcasts.
You're now in the podcast category.
And at the top, it's got the drop-down list.
Click the drop-down list,
and there is a list of every single podcast episode in order.
I think in reverse order, right?
So anyway, you can go back to episode one
and just click through each and every one of them
if you like to do it that way.
Same with interviews.
Same with videos.
Question 91.
Oh, we're almost there.
Question from Joseph.
I'm looking for your content on Rumble
and not seeing a channel of yours.
Is that correct?
If so, are you considering uploading on Rumble?
Or question 92, the player on your site isn't working,
which I've received many times from many people
on various occasions.
Yeah, sometimes the player in the embed
isn't displaying right or isn't working properly
or Odyssey is down or Bitshoot isn't working
or what have you.
So yes, when that happens, if you're on the front page,
there will always be the click here
just for show notes and comments
or show notes in MP3 or whatever.
Click that link, then you're in the actual post.
There will be the video player.
If that video player isn't working for you,
then underneath it, it will always say,
watch on Archive, Bitshoot, Odyssey, Rumble, blah, blah, blah.
All of those are links to all of the different platforms
where I am.
For example, Rumble, you can click that Rumble link
and you can go to my Rumble,
that particular post on my Rumble channel.
And from there, you can see my Rumble channel
or you can find any of my other platforms there.
So anyway, if it ever isn't working for you,
there's always many, many, many different platforms
on which you could be watching any given video.
Question 93, question from Jane.
Hello, James, I'm a bit confused.
I've been a long time member of the Corbett Report,
but on your last video,
you mentioned the Corbett Report sub-stack page,
which I have not heard of.
I went to that page and subscribed.
Now I've received an email as a new subscriber
for the Corbett Report itself.
Does my original membership with the Corbett Report
also allow me to be a member of your sub-stack?
Or did I need a separate membership for your sub-stack page?
Thank you for the email, Jane.
Oh boy. Oh, this is fun.
I think the confusion is around the word
subscribe in the very many different ways it is applied here.
Yes, you can subscribe to the Corbett Report,
i.e. become a paying member of CorbettReport.com
to log into CorbettReport.com for login privileges,
subscriber discounts, the subscriber newsletter, etc.
Or you can subscribe to my sub-stack,
which is to sign up to receive the email updates
whenever I post something.
And yes, I post things to sub-stack,
as well as my CorbettReport.com page.
So it exists in both places.
But my real work, my reals to the core is CorbettReport.com.
Don't ever lose sight of that, at least bookmark it,
in case sub-stack goes down or I get censored or whatever it is,
because that has happened in the past.
But hey, here's another level of confusion.
When you sign up via sub-stack, you can subscribe for free,
and you're on the free email list,
and you'll get the emails every time.
Or you can subscribe as a monthly or annual payment.
And in that case, what you were doing
is you were subscribing to become a paid member of CorbettReport.com.
So if you're already a paid member of CorbettReport.com,
and you want the email updates,
then you should go for the free email updates on sub-stack.
You don't have to pay me again.
And if you are paying via sub-stack,
you don't get anything from sub-stack.
You get login membership for the CorbettReport.com.
It's perfectly clear.
I don't understand why anyone has any questions about this.
Anyway, hope that helps.
But if not, contact me.
I'm happy to walk you through it.
Question 94 comes from Tao.
Why is it that episode 355 on your website is about Alex Jones?
Interview 355, Alex Jones.
But on your podcast feed, it's about the minimum wage.
In fact, I can't find the Jones interview on your podcast feed.
All right, interview 355, Alex Jones.
Podcast episode 355, minimum wage.
Interview is different from podcast.
So yes, interview one is different than episode one.
Interview 10 is different than episode 10.
And wait until you find out about questions for Corbett
and CorbettReport Radio and the other numbered podcasts
I have in the back catalog.
Is that confusing?
Anyway, it is what it is.
So yes, there is an interview feed and a podcast feed.
Don't confuse them.
All right, question 95 comes from Boris.
Hey, James, have you ever investigated Creosindicate?
Nope. Question 96 comes from JG.
Hello and good afternoon for Brazil.
Just curious if you know about goldbacks, goldback.com.
I am trying to find a way to bring them to Brazil.
Yes, I think Palado has even received a goldback or two via the PO box.
So we're happy to receive them if you got them out there.
Good luck in Brazil.
Question 97, question from Buzz.
James, what is your position today in regards to the Alex Jones
interview of Aaron Russo many years ago?
You at that time seem to disparage Russo's message to us
that there was a group intent on controlling our access to our money.
Thank you for your excellent work over the years.
Thank you, Buzz.
But nope, do not misrepresent me like that.
Fake news.
I never disparaged Russo's message or the idea of people
trying to control your money.
That's been a core central part of my message
since the very, very beginning of the Corbett Report.
No, I've always thought it is something like what he talked about in that interview.
But I did ask, back in Questions for Corbett number 38,
way back in the day, who is Nicholas Rockefeller?
And I still think that's a good question.
I think there are still some question marks surrounding that figure,
who I'm sure Aaron Russo believed to be a part of the Rockefeller family.
But was he really?
And how related?
And all of that.
But anyway, no, I was questioning who is Nicholas Rockefeller.
I was not questioning the long-term game plan
or disparaging that in any way, shape, or form.
And I have featured that Russo clip in particular,
several times actually, in the past.
So no, I was not disparaging that message.
Question 98 comes from Ricky.
First, thank you, brother.
I think everyone who has been red-pilled must have their aha moment.
And for me, that was watching your big oil docs.
I was like a ton of, it was like a ton of bricks to the face.
So thank you.
Well, you're welcome.
Now that I've watched everything you have,
are there some other good, reliable folks to check out?
My mind is now wide open,
but I want to fill it with good, solid info,
and not just any Tom Dick or Larry with some crackpot theory.
Maybe anyone else's documentaries to check out as well?
Thanks so much.
All right, well, Ricky, if you're familiar with my archives,
then you are now familiar with literally hundreds of people
that I have talked to over the years.
Dozens of documentaries, thousands of videos and articles
and all sorts of things that I have featured,
I've talked about, I've dissected.
Any one of those might be a good starting point for you.
Hey, that was really interesting.
I like that interview.
Who's that guy?
I think I'll check that guy out.
That's part of what I do.
And I think that is probably how a lot of people
discover new things.
I always try to bring on new people and talk to new people.
So hopefully there are many, many, many,
many, many, many answers in the archives.
And I'm not recommending any particular person.
It's whatever resonates with you,
whatever you think is interesting.
Question 99, almost there.
Do the events of the ICC's arrest warrant for Putin
and Trump's mention of his supposed impending arrest
coincide?
And could the US have influenced or manipulated the ICC
into his decision, into its decision?
What's happening behind the veil of these
likely synchronized stories?
And could more bank failures be planned
behind the veil of these events?
All right, thank you for the question.
I think that specifically the Putin arrest warrant
that Trump arrest, whatever,
I think it's more boogeyman theatrics
by the people casting the shadows on the cave wall.
And the moment that we start caring about these cave wall
shadows and what happens to them is the moment
that we start losing.
Oh my God, look at what they're doing to Vladimir
biosecurity state 2030 UN agenda
for sustainable development pushing Putin.
And Donald, the COVID vax was humanity's greatest
accomplishment.
Trump, oh my God, they're getting him.
The MSM are really against him.
So I must be for him and everything that he's doing.
Right?
I don't have a mind of my own.
So no, whatever.
I think that's theatrics.
Could it be used as a smoke screen for the next part
of an agenda?
Sure.
But anyway, I don't I'm trying as little as possible
to pay attention to the cave wall shadows.
Episode 100 question from question 100.
Episode from Catherine.
What?
Can't even speak anymore.
How many hours have we been doing this?
Question 100 question from Catherine.
How do I leave a question for Corbett?
Okay.
And so we arrive at the beginning.
Um, yeah, good question.
However you can.
Skywriting might work if I happen to be passing by
or in the comments section at corporate report.com,
which is the only comment section I look at
if you happen to be a corporate report member
or via the contact form.
But as you can see, I have a mountain of questions.
We only scratched the very tiniest layer of a surface.
I just dipped in and pulled out a hundred questions.
And there are thousands that I haven't gotten to
and presumably will not get to.
I don't think that this is a very helpful format.
And I'm glad I switched from the answer a bunch of questions
every QFC to answer one question
because I can answer one question in detail
in a way that'll actually provide some real meat for people.
So I prefer that, but that means, you know,
there's going to be a lot of questions I don't get to
and I don't answer.
Don't take it personally.
It's just I, I am absolutely,
I could spend the rest of my life doing nothing
other than answering emails and answering questions,
but I'm not going to spend the rest of my life doing that.
So anyway, keep sending them in and I will keep picking
ones that I think I can answer in an informative way
and tell you what, I promise you for episode questions for Corbett,
episode 1000, I will, I put it on record here,
I will answer 1000 questions.
But the joke's on you because I'm actually going to stop
numbering questions for Corbett after episode 100
because who cares what number it is?
Is anyone keeping track of the number?
Besides me?
No, of course not.
You care about the question, so the question title
will now just be the question, the episode,
it will not be sorted by number,
but if somebody wants to keep track at home,
hey wait, oh wait, this is, this is episode 1000,
90 years from now, you can come after me,
hey, you promised, answering 1000 questions
and I'll be there, don't worry.
Anyway, that was a lot of work,
I think I'm going to stop now, bye.
All right, whoo!